<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1164 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198879</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the case for a fresh decision, granting the appellant the opportunity to present their defense before the Tribunal. The Court emphasized the importance of ensuring litigants are not prejudiced by counsel errors and upheld the principles of natural justice by allowing the appellant to argue their case for justice to be served.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:45:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1164 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198879</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remanded the case for a fresh decision, granting the appellant the opportunity to present their defense before the Tribunal. The Court emphasized the importance of ensuring litigants are not prejudiced by counsel errors and upheld the principles of natural justice by allowing the appellant to argue their case for justice to be served.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>