2018 (2) TMI 618

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Respondent-Revenue ORDER Per: Dr. D.M. Misra Heard both sides. These two Appeals are filed against the Order-in-Appeal No.VAP-EXCUS-000-APP-04 -14-15 and No.VAP-EXCUS-000-APP-05-14-15 both dated 21.4.2014 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise & Customs, Vapi since involved a common issue are taken up together for disposal. The Appellants are having manufacturing lo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....before the ld. Commissioner (Appeals), who in turn, rejected their Appeals. Hence, the present Appeals. 2. The ld.Advocate for the Appellants submits that the credit availed by the Appellants in their Silvassa Unit had been denied alleging that the procedure laid down under Rule 7(b) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 has not been followed, hence, the credit availed by them is erroneous. It is his co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for confirmation of demand whereas no such provision has been invoked in the said Show Cause Notice because during the material period such provisions did not exist on statute. We further find that in Para 14 & 15 of the said Show Cause Notice a methodology was adopted for distribution of Cenvat credit into admissible and inadmissible credit on the basis of turnover. We do not find any provision o....