<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 618 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355197</link>
    <description>The Appeals were filed against the denial of credit to the Silvassa Unit for input services attributable to exempted units under Rule 7(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal, considering judgments from the Allahabad and Delhi Tribunals, set aside the Order-in-Original, emphasizing limitations in Show Cause Notices and the impact of repeated notices. Following this, the Delhi Bench ruled in favor of the Appellant, granting consequential relief and highlighting the importance of legal provisions and judicial discipline in determining the admissibility of CENVAT credit. The Appellants were successful in their appeals based on legal precedents and procedural compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 07:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 618 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355197</link>
      <description>The Appeals were filed against the denial of credit to the Silvassa Unit for input services attributable to exempted units under Rule 7(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal, considering judgments from the Allahabad and Delhi Tribunals, set aside the Order-in-Original, emphasizing limitations in Show Cause Notices and the impact of repeated notices. Following this, the Delhi Bench ruled in favor of the Appellant, granting consequential relief and highlighting the importance of legal provisions and judicial discipline in determining the admissibility of CENVAT credit. The Appellants were successful in their appeals based on legal precedents and procedural compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>