1947 (4) TMI 13

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....suit brought for recovery of Rs. 209-8-0 from the respondent. The respondent borrowed from one Nallvangalammal a sum of Rs. 100 on 2nd May, 1940 and a sum of Rs. 90 on the 24th July, 1940 agreeing to pay the amounts with interest at six per cent. per annum. Nallvangalammal died and the plaintiff claimed to be her heir and though this fact was not admitted, it is not necessary any longer to deal wi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the onus of establishing which certainly lay on him; but the defendant raised the contention that the suit was not sustainable on the two documents because they were inadmissible in evidence for any purpose as they were unstamped. The learned District Munsiff agreed with this contention and dismissed the suit. 5. It is not necessary for me to decide as to the exact nature of these two document....