https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198383 Where execution of a document is admitted, proof is dispensed with under Section 58 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. On that basis, the plaintiff was not required to prove the two hand-letters again, even though they were said to be unstamped and otherwise inadmissible on stamp-law grounds. The defendant's own admission and plea of substitution and partial discharge made further proof unnecessary, so the objection to maintainability failed and the dismissal of the suit was held unsustainable. en-us Thu, 10 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:01:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198383 Where execution of a document is admitted, proof is dispensed with under Section 58 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. On that basis, the plaintiff was not required to prove the two hand-letters again, even though they were said to be unstamped and otherwise inadmissible on stamp-law grounds. The defendant's own admission and plea of substitution and partial discharge made further proof unnecessary, so the objection to maintainability failed and the dismissal of the suit was held unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198383