Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (1) TMI 1523

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T & Sales Tax<br>K. Vinod Chandran, J. For the Petitioner : Sri. Harisankar V. Menon, Smt. Meera V. Menon For the Respondent : Sri V. K. Shamsudheen ORDER The petitioner was aggrieved with the rejection of the application for revision of assessment, for the year 2014-2015. The petitioner, a works contractor, filed Ext.P1 series of quarterly returns for the year 2014- 2015 conceding &#3....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rcial Tax Officer, Works Contract, Thrissur, which has not been acknowledged nor is the petitioner or the Consultant seen to have produced a hard copy of the same before the Commercial Tax Officer. In many cases, when the Assessing Officers issue notices by e-mail alone, this Court has held that the same is not proper, especially since it cannot be expected that an assessee would regularly open hi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion. From the words employed it is clear that the Assessing Officer has not been ever apprised of the communication by e-mail. If at all, the same was received and remaining in the mail box, the Assessing Officer would not have opened it and in such circumstance, merely on the contention that an application for revision was sent by e-mail, there cannot be any revision allowed to the petitioner. Th....