<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1523 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197995</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking revision of assessment for the year 2014-2015 by a works contractor. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims of requesting revision before the notice was issued and submitting prior applications, the Court emphasized the need for proper acknowledgment of communications. The Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of specific denial of e-mail receipt was noted, but the Court declined jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India due to appealable orders and no significant illegality. The petitioner was allowed to file a revision within three weeks to halt recovery proceedings pending the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1523 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197995</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking revision of assessment for the year 2014-2015 by a works contractor. Despite the petitioner&#039;s claims of requesting revision before the notice was issued and submitting prior applications, the Court emphasized the need for proper acknowledgment of communications. The Assessing Officer&#039;s lack of specific denial of e-mail receipt was noted, but the Court declined jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India due to appealable orders and no significant illegality. The petitioner was allowed to file a revision within three weeks to halt recovery proceedings pending the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>