2016 (8) TMI 1298

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri G.R. Singh, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal Nos. 173-176(DK)CE/JPR-II/2008, dated 25-9-2008. 2. The relevant fact that arise for consideration are the appellant herein is job worker for M/s. Fashion Suitings Pvt. Limited, Bhilwara (FSPL in short). The appellant ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. On an appeal filed, the first Appellate Authority set aside the penalty imposed on the Prop. but upheld the demand of the duty, interest thereof and the penalties imposed on the appellant herein. 3. Ms. Priyanka Goel, ld. Counsel appeared for the appellant and submitted that they are contesting only the penalty imposed and are not contesting the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ect the appeal to that extent. 6. As regards the penalty, we find that the proposition putforth by ld. Counsel merits acceptance as in the case in hand it is undisputed and on record that FSPL had filed a declaration with the jurisdictional authorities of the appellant that they are functioning under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. The said notification envisages manufacturing of goods in the....