https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196058 The Tribunal upheld duty liability, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant, a job worker, except for the penalty on the Prop. The appellant contested penalties under Rule 25 or Rule 26, arguing no contravention. The Tribunal accepted the appellant's argument, finding no wrongdoing as they relied on FSPL's declaration for manufacturing and clearing goods. FSPL's misutilization did not make the appellant liable, leading to the penalties being set aside. The judgment highlighted the appellant's innocence in the matter, absolving them of penalties due to their reliance on FSPL's information. en-us Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 12:10:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196058 The Tribunal upheld duty liability, interest, and penalties imposed on the appellant, a job worker, except for the penalty on the Prop. The appellant contested penalties under Rule 25 or Rule 26, arguing no contravention. The Tribunal accepted the appellant's argument, finding no wrongdoing as they relied on FSPL's declaration for manufacturing and clearing goods. FSPL's misutilization did not make the appellant liable, leading to the penalties being set aside. The judgment highlighted the appellant's innocence in the matter, absolving them of penalties due to their reliance on FSPL's information. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196058