Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (11) TMI 290

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nbsp;- For the Appellant Dr. J. Harish, Dy. Commissioner(AR) - For the Respondent ORDER Per : S.S Garg The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dt. 29/08/2011 passed by the Commissioner(Appeals) whereby the Commissioner(Appeals) upheld the Order-in-original and rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2.   Briefly the facts of the present case are that the ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....not sustainable in law as the same has been passed by misinterpreting the provisions of the Act and also by ignoring the judicial precedents.  He further submitted that the appellant is a non-profiteering organisation and could not have indulged in suppression of facts leave alone with intent to evade payment of statutory levy.  He further submitted that the Revenue has not produced any ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of his submission, he relied upon the following decisions: i. LMJ Service Ltd. Vs. CCE&ST, Jaipur-II [2015(38) STR 64 (Tri. Del.)] ii. Shantilal Nensukh Khothari Vs. CCE, Pune-III [2015(40) STR 348 (Tri. Mum.)] 5.   On the other hand, the learned AR reiterated the findings of the impugned order. 6.   Considering the fact that the liability under renting of immovable....