https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350411 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties but confirming interest liability under Sections 77, 78, and 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's genuine belief in non-liability for service tax on renting of immovable property services was acknowledged, leading to the waiver of penalties. However, the appellant was held liable for interest payment. The decision was based on ongoing legal disputes and the appellant's bona fide belief, as reflected in legal arguments and precedents cited during the case. en-us Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:47:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350411 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties but confirming interest liability under Sections 77, 78, and 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant's genuine belief in non-liability for service tax on renting of immovable property services was acknowledged, leading to the waiver of penalties. However, the appellant was held liable for interest payment. The decision was based on ongoing legal disputes and the appellant's bona fide belief, as reflected in legal arguments and precedents cited during the case. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350411