Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (8) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n appeal filed by the Revenue (Income-tax Department) under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against an order, dated March 3, 1999, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T. (SS) A. No. 455/Ind of 1995. In short, the question that arises for consideration in this appeal is, whether this appeal involves any substantial question of law as is required to be made out under sectio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ties, i.e., the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, no case whatsoever is made out to invoke the provisions of section 271(1)(c) and hence, the order of penalty passed by the Assessing Officer was not sustainable. We concur with these findings and uphold it as in our opinion, it does not call for any interference in our second appellate jurisdiction conferred upon us under secti....