<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 17 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10071</link>
    <description>The High Court of MADHYA PRADESH dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it did not involve any substantial question of law. The court upheld the decisions of the authorities in setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c), as the Assessing Officer found no concealment of income. The court concluded that the case did not warrant interference in their appellate jurisdiction, as the appeal failed to meet the criteria for admission under section 260A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=49093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 17 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10071</link>
      <description>The High Court of MADHYA PRADESH dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as it did not involve any substantial question of law. The court upheld the decisions of the authorities in setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c), as the Assessing Officer found no concealment of income. The court concluded that the case did not warrant interference in their appellate jurisdiction, as the appeal failed to meet the criteria for admission under section 260A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=10071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>