2017 (9) TMI 998

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Asstt. Commr.  (A.R) for respondent ORDER This is an appeal filed by the appellant challenging the Order-in-Appeal No. SK/260/RGD/2013-14 dt. 30.9.2013,  which was passed against order-in-original No. Raigad/ADC/99/12-13 dt.16.1.2013 involving the imposition of penalty corresponding to the demand confirmed in the order-in-original No. Raigad/ADC/99/12-13 dt.16.1.2013. 2.  ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bmits that the assessee's appeal on the demand has been allowed by the Tribunal which was reported  as Inox Air Products Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad 2015 (38) STR 179 (Tri.-Mumbai). Therefore the present appeal on penalty which is consequent to the demand also deserves to be allowed. 3.  Shri V.R. Reddy, Ld. Assistant Commissioner (A.R.) appearing on behalf of the ....