<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 998 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant challenging the imposition of a penalty corresponding to a demand confirmed in the original order. The Tribunal considered the previous decision in favor of the appellant in the demand case and concluded that since the demand had been decided in their favor, the penalty appeal should also be allowed. After reviewing submissions from both parties and the entire proceedings, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and ruled in favor of the appellant, providing a comprehensive analysis of the legal issues involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:19:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=489829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 998 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant challenging the imposition of a penalty corresponding to a demand confirmed in the original order. The Tribunal considered the previous decision in favor of the appellant in the demand case and concluded that since the demand had been decided in their favor, the penalty appeal should also be allowed. After reviewing submissions from both parties and the entire proceedings, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and ruled in favor of the appellant, providing a comprehensive analysis of the legal issues involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=348241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>