2017 (9) TMI 599
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....n For the Respondents : Mr. K. Magesh ORDER Heard Mr.M.A.Mudimannan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Magesh, learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order passed by the 3rd respondent dated 20.03.2002 which affirms the orders passed by the 2nd respondent namely, the Commissioner of ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cessors Ltd. has not obliged to debond the unit, while supplying the fabrics manufactured by them to garment exporters in India. In the said writ petition, it appears that an order of interim injunction was obtained. 5. Therefore, the petitioner's case is that General Notes 2 of the Notification No.67/98 as amended is deemed to have been suspended, because of the interim order and therefore....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t petition filed by M/s.Arun Processors Ltd. When the case is heard today, learned counsel for the respondent produced a copy of the order dated 15.11.2001, from which, it is seen that the writ petition filed by M/s.Arun Processors Ltd. has been dismissed with cost. 8. Thus, the entire interpretation based on which, the petitioner has founded his case has totally lost its efficacy and the only ....
TaxTMI