https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347842 In writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the High Court will not reappreciate concurrent findings of fact recorded by the adjudicating, appellate and revisional authorities unless a sustainable ground for interference is shown. The challenge here depended on an earlier writ order in favour of a third party, but the record showed that the earlier petition had already been dismissed with costs, leaving no surviving factual or legal basis for interference. The Court therefore declined to sit in appeal over the statutory findings and rejected the writ petition. en-us Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:32:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347842 In writ jurisdiction under Article 226, the High Court will not reappreciate concurrent findings of fact recorded by the adjudicating, appellate and revisional authorities unless a sustainable ground for interference is shown. The challenge here depended on an earlier writ order in favour of a third party, but the record showed that the earlier petition had already been dismissed with costs, leaving no surviving factual or legal basis for interference. The Court therefore declined to sit in appeal over the statutory findings and rejected the writ petition. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347842