2016 (10) TMI 1081
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....AND HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE MS VIDHI J BHATT, ADVOCATE FOR THE APPLICANT MRS MAUNA M BHATT, ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT) Mrs. Bhatt, learned advocate for the respondent nos.1 and 2, seeks time for placing on record affidavit of the concerned respondent to overcome the technical plea raised that the said respondent....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... above order that Mrs. Bhatt's statement was to be continued till the next date of hearing. The entire contention is based upon the discriminatory treatment meted out to the applicant and similarly situated persons in the State of Gujarat, despite there being a clear order of the Supreme Court in their favour. The enigmatic omission to follow the order of the Supreme Court on ostensible rea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e one more date and adjournment so that the technical objection could be overcome. When the Court is inclined to accept the request for adjournment so as to enable the counsel for the respondents to complete the formality of pleadings, it would be in the fitness of thing that the statement ought to have been continued. However, when the counsel has pleaded her inability to continue with the statem....
TaxTMI