https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193836 The Court addressed the technical objection of the missing affidavit by respondent no.1 and highlighted the discriminatory treatment faced by the applicant and others despite a Supreme Court order. The Court expressed dissatisfaction with the delay in filing the affidavit and emphasized the need to prevent such discriminatory actions. Despite a request for adjournment to rectify the objection, the Court decided to maintain the status quo regarding promotions from Income Tax Officers to Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax until the next hearing. The judgment focused on fairness and adherence to legal procedures. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:10:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193836 The Court addressed the technical objection of the missing affidavit by respondent no.1 and highlighted the discriminatory treatment faced by the applicant and others despite a Supreme Court order. The Court expressed dissatisfaction with the delay in filing the affidavit and emphasized the need to prevent such discriminatory actions. Despite a request for adjournment to rectify the objection, the Court decided to maintain the status quo regarding promotions from Income Tax Officers to Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax until the next hearing. The judgment focused on fairness and adherence to legal procedures. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193836