2016 (11) TMI 1411

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Petitioner : S. Raveekumar For the Respondent : S. Kanmani Annamalai, AGP ORDER Heard both. 2. The impugned order in this writ petition is an order of assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the year 2013-14. In fact, the order impugned is an order passed pursuant to a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act read with Section 9(2)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....along with xerox copy of annual returns, export documents and other documents produced by the petitioner. Thus, this is evident that the entire matter, as projected by the petitioner in the petition dated 26.10.2015, has not been considered. For the reason that the respondent, in the impugned order dated 14.6.2016, has not even referred to the petition under Section 84 of the State Act, 2006 read ....