2016 (11) TMI 1412

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>T. S. Sivagnanam, J. For the Petitioner : S. Raveekumar For the Respondent : S. Kanmani Annamalai, AGP ORDER The petitioner is a registered dealer on the file of the respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. In these writ petitions, the petitioner challenged the orders of assessment under t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y of the particulars could not be verified and copies were sought for with further opportunity to the petitioner to reconcile the allegation of mismatch, in the impugned orders, the respondent stated that the petitioner did not utilize the opportunity of being heard on 8.3.2016 and nor produced any details. Initially, this Court is of the view that the petitioner did not appear. But, there is no d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondent was convinced that the proposal requires partial confirmation, then it goes without saying that the petitioner had produced certain material or was able to explain to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer that the allegation of mismatch was not made out. 6. However, the contention of the petitioner is that full particulars were not furnished and that the system failed because of the ....