Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1971 (4) TMI 11

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....appeal against the order under section 27 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and further cancelling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(i) of the Income-tax Act ? " The assessee is a private limited company engaged in transport business. It was incorporated in May, 1959, and closed its account for the first time on December 31, 1960. We are concerned in this reference with the assessment year 1961-62, the relevant year of account being the calendar year 1960. On April 24, 1961, a notice under section 22(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, was published in the press requiring every person whose total income during the previous year exceeded the maximum amount which was not chargeable to income-tax to furnish within sixty-five days a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion 23(4) of the Act of 1922 on an estimated total income of Rs. 30,000. A few days later, on August 21, 1962, the assessee applied under section 27 of the Act of 1922 for cancellation of the assessment on the ground that the account books were not complete and, therefore, the return could not be filed. The application was rejected by the Income-tax Officer on September 28, 1962. Then, on March 25, 1963, the Income-tax Officer made an order under section 271 (1)(i) of the Act of 1961 imposing a penalty of Rs. 3,780 for failure of the assessee to file its return in response to the notice under section 22(2) of the Act of 1922. The assessee appealed against the assessment order made under section 23(4) but the Appellate Assistant Commissioner....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... were also set aside. The question then is whether the Income-tax Officer had the power to serve the notice under section 22(2) requiring an assessee to file his return of income even before the expiry of the period mentioned under section 22(1). Section 22(1) provides : " 22. (1) Return of Income.- The Income-tax Officer shall, on or before the 1st day of May in each year, give notice by publication in the press and by publication in the prescribed manner, requiring every person whose total income during the previous year exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax to furnish, within such period not being less than sixty days as may be specified in the notice, a return, in the prescribed form and verified in the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... his jurisdiction. That pre-requisite is a feature of the notice under section 22(2). Section 22(2) empowers the Income-tax Officer to serve a notice calling for a return where he is of opinion that the total income of the person to whom the notice is directed is such as to render him liable to income-tax. The crucial question in this case is whether the Income-tax Officer can serve the notice under section 22(2) at any time or can he do so only after the expiry of the time specified in the notice under section 22(1) for filing a return. It seems to us that it is open to the Income-tax Officer to serve the notice under section 22(2) at any time during the assessment year. There is nothing in the terms of that provision precluding him fro....