<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (4) TMI 11 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8254</link>
    <description>A notice under section 22(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 may validly be served before the time for filing a return under section 22(1) expires, because the two provisions operate in different fields and section 22(2) contains no postponement requirement. The text states that the Income-tax Officer may issue the specific notice at any time during the assessment year once the requisite opinion of liability is formed. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was erroneous, and the ex parte assessment under section 23(4), together with the consequential order under section 27 and penalty under section 271(1)(i), was stated to be sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=47298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (4) TMI 11 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8254</link>
      <description>A notice under section 22(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 may validly be served before the time for filing a return under section 22(1) expires, because the two provisions operate in different fields and section 22(2) contains no postponement requirement. The text states that the Income-tax Officer may issue the specific notice at any time during the assessment year once the requisite opinion of liability is formed. On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was erroneous, and the ex parte assessment under section 23(4), together with the consequential order under section 27 and penalty under section 271(1)(i), was stated to be sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=8254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>