2016 (4) TMI 1215
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..../b, Vaibhav P. Patankar, for the Petitioner. Shri A.S. Rao and Nilesh Kalatri, for the Respondent. ORDER After the petition was argued for some time and attention of Mr. Rao was invited to the recording of dates and events in the impugned order, he could not dispute as to how the order carrying a date of 30th October, 2015, would refer to a document/letter annexing therewith a verificatio....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....in the face of multiple remedies only because we find that at Paragraph 17 of the order impugned in the petition, it refers to the verification report dated 5th November, 2015. The order, however, is dated 30th October, 2015, and we do not express any opinion as to whether it is a mistake or otherwise. Once this report and copy of which is at page 76 of the paper-book was not disclosed with its co....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI