https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191463 The impugned order in this case was set aside due to a discrepancy in the date mentioned, leading to the petition being entertained by the Court. The failure to disclose a verification report deprived the Petitioner of a fair opportunity to respond. The Court directed a fresh hearing by the Commissioner, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles. The Commissioner was instructed to issue a new order based solely on merits within two months. The judgment highlighted the importance of rectifying errors, ensuring a fair hearing, and upholding the integrity of the decision-making process. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Apr 2017 07:02:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191463 The impugned order in this case was set aside due to a discrepancy in the date mentioned, leading to the petition being entertained by the Court. The failure to disclose a verification report deprived the Petitioner of a fair opportunity to respond. The Court directed a fresh hearing by the Commissioner, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to legal principles. The Commissioner was instructed to issue a new order based solely on merits within two months. The judgment highlighted the importance of rectifying errors, ensuring a fair hearing, and upholding the integrity of the decision-making process. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191463