2017 (4) TMI 141
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cation Nos. 16428- 16429 and 16426 of 2016 - -<br>Customs<br>Harsha Devani and A.S. Supehia, JJ. Shri P.R. Gupta and Hardik P. Modh, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri Devang Vyas, ASG, Gaurav S. Mathur and Kuntal Parikh, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Harsha Devani, J. (Common Oral)]. - Since the relief claimed in all these applications is similar, the same were tak....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the applicant in Civil Application Nos. 11970/2016 to 11972/2016 and Mr. Hardik Modh, learned advocate for the applicant in Civil Application No. 11986/2016 state that the applicants are interested parties as contemplated under Section 2(c) of the CEGAT (Countervailing Duty and Anti-dumping Duty) Procedure Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules"). It was submitted that the applicants ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the respective parties. 8. From the facts as emerging from the record, it is apparent that what is subject matter of challenge in the captioned petitions are the final findings of the Designated Authority under Rule 17 of the Anti-dumping Rules, 1995. Upon publication of the final findings by the Designated Authority, the Centr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e investigation, the applicants can be said to be necessary parties to the captioned petitions. 9. The applications therefore, succeed and are accordingly allowed. The applicant in Civil Application Nos. 11970/2016, 11971/2016 and 11972/2016 Saint-Gobain India Private Limited, is permitted to be joined as a respondent in Special Civil Application Nos. 16427/2016, 16428/2016 and 16429/2016 ....


TaxTMI