<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 141 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341171</link>
    <description>Interested persons who participated in an anti-dumping investigation and submitted representations before the Designated Authority may be impleaded in writ petitions challenging the final findings and the procedure adopted by the authority. The governing procedural rules recognise such participants as directly connected to the subject matter of the challenge, so their presence is necessary for effective adjudication. On that basis, the applicants were treated as necessary parties and were allowed to be joined as respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2017 09:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=464642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 141 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341171</link>
      <description>Interested persons who participated in an anti-dumping investigation and submitted representations before the Designated Authority may be impleaded in writ petitions challenging the final findings and the procedure adopted by the authority. The governing procedural rules recognise such participants as directly connected to the subject matter of the challenge, so their presence is necessary for effective adjudication. On that basis, the applicants were treated as necessary parties and were allowed to be joined as respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>