2017 (4) TMI 115

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... law for our consideration: "(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition made on account of bogus purchases and bogus labour charges without appreciating the factual aspect and by ignoring the manifest evidence relied by the Assessing Officer? (b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that statement of Shri Anilkumar Chawla was recorded under coercive pressure and said statement was not given by free will ignoring the fact that statement was recorded on oath u/s. 131 of the I. T. Act, 1961?". 3 For the subject Assessment Year, the Assessing Officer passed an order on 16th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....009 before the Assessing Officer indicating the fact that the statement made to the DCIT, Navsari to the effect that he had not executed any labour jobs or made any sales to the RespondentAssessee were retracted. Besides, it records the fact that in the appeal filed by Mr. Anilkumar Chahwalla in his assessment proceedings, the CIT(A), Valsad had on consideration of all facts, taken a view that the transaction between the Respondent Assessee and Mr. Anilkumar Chahwalla, were genuine. In the light of the above, it held that there was no reason to consider the same to be bogus or mere accommodation entires. On merits also, the CIT(A) found the confirmation letters from Mr. Anilkumar Chahwalla, copies of purchase invoices indicating all details....