<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 115 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341145</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions made on account of bogus purchases and labour charges. The Court found that the statement recorded under coercion was retracted and that the transactions were genuine. As no substantial question of law arose, the appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:28:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 115 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341145</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of additions made on account of bogus purchases and labour charges. The Court found that the statement recorded under coercion was retracted and that the transactions were genuine. As no substantial question of law arose, the appeal was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>