2017 (3) TMI 1103

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent ORDER Brief facts of the case are that during the period 2008-2012, the appellant had provided Works Contract Service to Madhya Pradesh Transmission Company Ltd., Bhopal (MPPTCL). The service tax attributable to such taxable service was not deposited by the appellant, for which the department initiated Show Cause proceedings, which culminated in the adjudication order dated 27.0....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion proceedings. It is his submission that the charges of fraud, collusion, mis appropriation, with intent to payment of service tax cannot be leveled against the assessee inasmuch as no specific findings to that effect have been recorded by the authorities below in the respective orders. Thus, he pleads for the benefit of Section 80 ibid for non-imposition of penalties. 3. Ld. DR, on the other....