<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1103 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340600</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the benefit of Section 80 and setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. This decision was based on the lack of evidence of fraudulent activities by the appellant and their compliance with tax payment after being informed of the liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:13:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=462227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1103 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340600</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting the benefit of Section 80 and setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. This decision was based on the lack of evidence of fraudulent activities by the appellant and their compliance with tax payment after being informed of the liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>