2017 (3) TMI 347
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....titioners. Mr. Avinash J. Rana, Senior Counsel with Mr. Deepak Thakkar & Mr. Dushyant Kumar for the Respondents. ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Shri S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) : 1. Rule. The respondents waive service. By consent, rule is made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rpretation Committee in its Meeting No.10/AM11 held on 15.03.2011 is ultra vires, null and void and of no effect, (ii) the Petitioners are entitle to the deemed export benefit in respect of the projects undertaken by them and referred to above," 3. The parties do not seriously dispute that the case at hand is similar to the one dealt with by this Court in Writ Petition Nos.6846 with 82....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the Revenue's stand, as reflected in the show cause notice and the letter which are impugned in the writ petition, is correct both on facts and law. After having invited his attention to the Division Bench Judgment in Patel Engineering (supra), he states that the Revenue has challenged this Judgment and Order in the higher Court. The proceedings are pending before the Hon'ble Supreme Court....
TaxTMI