Court grants relief in cancellation of Show Cause Notice & Demand Letter, allowing writ petition based on precedent.

The Court allowed the writ petition, relying on the precedent set by a previous case. The rule was made absolute in favor of the petitioners, granting the relief sought in cancellation of the Show Cause Notice and Demand Letter. No costs were awarded in this matter.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to show cause notice and demand letter seeking recovery of refund; Jurisdiction of Policy Interpretation Committee; Deemed export benefit entitlement.

Analysis:
The writ petition sought various reliefs, including the cancellation and withdrawal of the impugned Show Cause Notice and Demand Letter, as well as a declaration that the decision taken by the Policy Interpretation Committee was ultra vires. The Court noted similarities with a previous case and referred to a specific Judgment and Order. The petitioners argued that the denial of deemed export benefit and the recovery sought were without jurisdiction and illegal.

The respondents contended that the writ petition was not maintainable, but also defended the Revenue's stand on merits, stating it was correct both factually and legally. Despite the Division Bench's ruling against the Revenue, the respondents stood by their position. The Court, after hearing both parties, found that the issue was already addressed in the previous Patel Engineering case. The Revenue's challenge in the higher court did not affect the validity of the previous judgment, leading the Court to uphold its earlier decision.

Consequently, the Court allowed the writ petition, relying on the precedent set by the Patel Engineering case. The rule was made absolute in favor of the petitioners, granting the relief sought in prayer clauses (a) and (b). No costs were awarded in this matter.

---