2017 (2) TMI 1057
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... Mr. Wattan Sharma,Adv. For Mr. D. Mahesh Babu, Adv For the Respondent : Mr. Mahaling Pandarge,Addl.Govt.Adv. Mr. Nishant Katneshwarkar,Adv. Mr. Ravindra Keshavrao Adsure, Adv. (Not present) ORDER 1. We have heard learned counsel for the rival parties. 2. The issue under consideration revolves around the detention order dated 11th August, 2005. The petitioner ventured to assail the ab....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ts, that the petitioner indulged in any untoward activity, whilst the instant petition was pending before this Court, and whilst the petitioner was a free citizen, enjoying absolute liberty. In the above view of the matter, there can hardly be any justification, for sustaining the detention order dated 11th August, 2005. 4. Besides the inference drawn hereinabove, it is also pertinent to notice....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is surprising that though the allegation of import of Ball Bearings in the guise of Borax Decahydrate in the past is leveled, any statement of Customs Officer who examined and allowed clearance of the said past consignments has not even been recorded by DRI, nor any allegation against the examining officer for abetting has been leveled in the Show Cause Notice, in absence of which it is not possib....
TaxTMI