https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339357 The Court set aside the detention order dated 11th August, 2005, as improper and unjustified after considering the Settlement Commission's findings exonerating the petitioner from any involvement in the alleged activities. The writ petition challenging the detention order, filed in 2006, remained pending for over 10 years with no evidence of unlawful activities by the petitioner during this period. An interim order in 2007 restrained the state from executing the detention order, and the petitioner was never arrested following that order. en-us Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Aug 2017 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339357 The Court set aside the detention order dated 11th August, 2005, as improper and unjustified after considering the Settlement Commission's findings exonerating the petitioner from any involvement in the alleged activities. The writ petition challenging the detention order, filed in 2006, remained pending for over 10 years with no evidence of unlawful activities by the petitioner during this period. An interim order in 2007 restrained the state from executing the detention order, and the petitioner was never arrested following that order. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=339357