2017 (2) TMI 759

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the Appellant. Shri Harvinder Singh, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Ashok Jindal, Member (J)]. - The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the benefit of Notification No. 30/2004-C.E., dated 9-7-2004 has been denied to the appellant. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is manufacturer of various kinds of yarn. As per Notification No....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2005 to deny the exemption under Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. consequently, to demand duty on clearance made by the appellant on the said goods along with interest and to impose penalty on the appellant. The matter was adjudicated and the adjudicating authority denied the benefit of Notification and confirmed the demand of duty against the appellant along with interest and penalty was also impose....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....earlier period and subsequent period wherein the adjudicating authority has granted the benefit of Notification No. 30/2004-C.E. and proposals made in the show cause notice were dropped. Therefore, he prayed that the impugned order is to be set aside. 4. On the other hand, learned AR reiterated the findings of the impugned order. 5. Heard the parties and considered the submissions.....