2017 (2) TMI 760

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....B<br>Central Excise<br>Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (J) and C.J. Mathew, Member (T) Shri K.M. Mondal, Spl. Counsel, for the Appellant. Ms. Nahel Parekh, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Ramesh Nair, Member (J)]. - The Revenue had filed one appeal bearing No. E/677/2007 in respect of M/s. Metro Shoes Ltd., however subsequently these 9 appeals along with COD Applications were....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erefore, under the provisions of Section 35E(1) of the said Act, directs the Commissioner, C. Ex., Mumbai-I, to apply to the CESTAT for correct determination of the following points arising out of the said order : (a)&nbsp; Whether after taking into consideration, the facts and circumstances as stated above, read with the show cause notices, the said order of the Commissioner, C.Ex. Mumba....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oes, therefore in our considered view, appeals lie only against these two parties. From the entire review order, there is no suggestion that Revenue is aggrieved by the portion of the order whereby adjudicating authority refrained from imposition of any penalty on the eight persons as listed below : 1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Abdul Malik Tejani 2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nb....