2017 (2) TMI 356

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)]. - None present for respondent. Revenue brings out that there is no dispute by the respondent as to fake and spurious goods imported and it was ultimately found to be in breach of law relating to Intellectual Property. So also violation of provisions of Customs Act, 1962. The adjudicating authority while ....