https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338656 The appellate authority upheld the adjudication finding of violation of Intellectual Property law and Customs Act, 1962, reinstating the confiscation of goods, including specific items like Johnson's Baby Shampoo. The order directed the destruction of goods with the importer bearing the cost and emphasized enforcing penalties for breaching the law. The judgment primarily favored Revenue appeals, sending a strong message that breaches of Intellectual Property rights and Customs regulations will result in penal consequences. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:14:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338656 The appellate authority upheld the adjudication finding of violation of Intellectual Property law and Customs Act, 1962, reinstating the confiscation of goods, including specific items like Johnson's Baby Shampoo. The order directed the destruction of goods with the importer bearing the cost and emphasized enforcing penalties for breaching the law. The judgment primarily favored Revenue appeals, sending a strong message that breaches of Intellectual Property rights and Customs regulations will result in penal consequences. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338656