Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2017 (2) TMI 354

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l against order-in-original no. 07/2005-AP.COMMISSIONER dated 30^th May 2005 of Commissioner of Customs, Goa which has rejected the declared value, resorted to enhancement of assessable value, confirmed differential duty of Rs. 14,60,268/- with interest thereon, confiscated the goods while acknowledging the lack of their availability, imposed penalty under an unspecified provision in lieu of redem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g remand to the adjudicating authority for re-determination of these points. 3. None appeared for respondent. Learned Authorised Representative reiterated the contents of the appeal. 4. There is no doubt that the impugned order has merely imposed penalty under section 114A without identifying the person from whom it is to be recovered. I do not find this to be a lacuna in the impugned order;....