<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 354 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338654</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under sections 114A and 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The penalties were deemed appropriate, with the tribunal ruling that the importer was liable for penalty under section 114A and that the penalty imposed under section 112 was justified. The tribunal found no error in the penalty imposition and confirmed the penalties under both sections, concluding the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 354 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338654</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the penalties imposed under sections 114A and 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The penalties were deemed appropriate, with the tribunal ruling that the importer was liable for penalty under section 114A and that the penalty imposed under section 112 was justified. The tribunal found no error in the penalty imposition and confirmed the penalties under both sections, concluding the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>