2017 (1) TMI 1187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri Nagaraj Naik, AR for the Respondent. [Order per: Ms. Sulekha Beevi, C.S.] 1. The issue in appeal relate to alleged evasion of service tax by appellant in respect of Security Agency Service provided by them during the period October 2000 to September 2005. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the appellant Shri V.J. Shankaram submitted that the appellants ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tax liability thereon. Even so, they have not remitted the said liability to the exchequer. It is also seen that adjudicating authority has fully analysed the issue at hand and has had made a reasonable /correct findings in para 11 to 17 of his 3 order. In the circumstances, the appellant certainly has not come out with clean hands to this forum and hence the appeal for extension of CUM duty be....