https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338107 The tribunal upheld the demand for duty amounting to the tax liability on security agency services provided by the appellant during the relevant period. The appellant was required to settle the remaining balance within one month and pay interest. The penalty under Section 76 was upheld, but the penalty under Section 78 was modified to 25% of the service tax demanded, provided the appellant cleared the entire duty liability with interest and the reduced penalty within a month. No further penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, was to be imposed. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:07:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338107 The tribunal upheld the demand for duty amounting to the tax liability on security agency services provided by the appellant during the relevant period. The appellant was required to settle the remaining balance within one month and pay interest. The penalty under Section 76 was upheld, but the penalty under Section 78 was modified to 25% of the service tax demanded, provided the appellant cleared the entire duty liability with interest and the reduced penalty within a month. No further penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, was to be imposed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=338107