2016 (3) TMI 1154
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Karthikeyan, Additional Government Pleader, for the respondent ORDER The only ground which has been raised by the petitioner is that inspite of the fact that in the reply given by the petitioner, he has specifically sought for personal hearing, such opportunity was not extended by the respondent. Though the petitioner firm has given a detailed reply, the authority concerned has not considered in....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d by the authorities in a proper manner and thus, he wants to sustain the order impugned in this Writ Petition. 3. Taking into consideration of the fact that personal hearing is must and in view of the fact that the tax liability is limited one and following the judgment made in (2010) 33 VST 333 (Mad) Vs. SRC Projects Private Ltd Vs The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Chennai and another an....