Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for failure to grant the petitioner a personal hearing before passing the order under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: The order was challenged on the ground that, despite a specific request in the reply, no personal hearing was afforded before completion of the assessment. The Court treated personal hearing as mandatory in the facts of the case and relied on the earlier decision cited before it, while also noticing the petitioner's willingness to deposit 20% of the tax demand to show bona fides. In these circumstances, the assessment could not be sustained without affording the petitioner an effective hearing and considering the reply on merits.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh consideration after granting personal hearing, subject to deposit of 20% of the demanded tax within the time stipulated.