Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 1098

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the appellant is a contractor executing works of various contractees. As per the provisions of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short, 'the Act'), the contractee is liable to deduct tax from the payment to be made to the contractors and deposit the same with the department. In terms of the certificate issued to the contractor by the contractees, the credit of the amount reflected therein is granted to the contractor out of the tax payable by him. The assessment of the appellant for the year 2006-07 was framed by the Assessing Authority vide order dated 23.3.2010. The works contract tax was determined at Rs. 95,02,695/-. The payments to the tune of Rs. 94,05,576/- were verified, the credit for which was given. In addition, interest was levied under Section 14(6) of the Act. Aggrieved against the order of assessment levying interest, the appellant preferred appeal before the Joint Excise & Taxation Commissioner (Appeals), Faridabad, who vide order dated 6.1.2011, dismissed the same. The order was upheld by the Tribunal vide order dated 9.8.2011. The matter was remanded back only for the purpose of recomputation of the interest liability, as the Tribunal opined....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....furnished quarterly. 7. While referring to the aforesaid provisions of the Act and the Rules framed thereunder, the submission is that the provisions for deduction of tax at source were added in the statutes only to safeguard the interest of the revenue. Duty was cast on a contractee to deduct the tax for any work got executed by him for better compliance of the provisions of the Act. Once the contractee has been made liable to deduct tax and deposit the same with the department for any default on his part, action is to be taken against him and not against the contractor. While deducting the tax, a contractee is working as an agent of the government. The contractor has no means to ensure that a contractee is complying with the provisions of the Act. He is only to furnish the certificate to the contractor showing deposit of tax in the Treasury. A contractee can be penalised for default in deduction or deposit of tax. The interest of the department is well protected as action can be and should be taken against him. Interest is compensatory. Once the contractee can be penalised to the extent of 100% of the amount in dispute, that takes care of the amount of interest which could pos....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the case in hand is not of few days, rather of years in some transactions, hence, the appellant cannot escape from liability to pay interest. 12. Learned counsel for the State further submitted that at present she has no information about any action taken against the contractee. 13. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paper book. 14. The relevant provisions of the Act and the Rules are reproduced hereunder:- Section 14 of the Act "Submission of returns and payment of Tax 14. (1) Tax payable under this Act shall be paid in the manner and at such intervals as hereinafter provided. (2) The following dealers or class or classes of dealers, whether or not liable to pay tax, namely: - (a) such class or classes of dealers as may be prescribed; (b) such dealer as may be required so to do by the assessing authority by notice in the prescribed form served in the prescribed manner, (c) a dealer who has applied for the grant of registration certificate but no final decision on his application has been taken; and (d) every registered dealer, shall furnish such returns including for statistical purposes at such intervals, verified by such person....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ely to be paid during a year by any person to a dealer does not or is not likely to exceed one lakh rupees or such other amount as may be prescribed. (3) Every person who is required to deduct tax in advance under sub-section (1) shall furnish such returns at such intervals by such dates in such manner to such authority as may be prescribed and shall pay the tax deducted according to such returns to the State Government in such manner as may be prescribed. (4) Every person referred to in sub-section (3) shall issue to the payee a certificate of tax deduction and payment in such form in such manner as may be prescribed. (5) Any tax paid to the State Government in accordance with sub-section (3) shall be adjustable by the payee, on the authority of the certificate issued to him under sub-section (4), with the tax payable by him under this Act and the assessing authority shall, on furnishing of such certificate to it, allow the benefit of such adjustment after due verification of the payment. (6) If any person fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax as required by or under the provisions of sub-section (1), or fails to pay the whole or any part of the tax as requi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o the account, recovery of dues or in any other manner to the commission agent as valuable consideration for selling the grains, deduct tax in advance from such payment calculated by multiplying the amount paid in any manner with four per cent or such other rate, as notified under sub-section (1) of section 24. (2) Every contractee shall, at the time of making payment, whether by cash, adjustment, credit to the account, recovery of dues or in any other manner, deduct from the payment made to the contractor for execution of a works contract in the State involving transfer of property in goods, whether as goods or in some other form, tax in advance calculated by multiplying the amount paid in any manner with four per cent or such other rate, as notified under sub-section (1) of section 24. Explanation. - For the purpose of the foregoing sub-rules, the valuable consideration shall not include the amount of tax, if any, forming part of the consideration. (3) The provisions of sub-rules (1) and (2) shall not apply where the amount or the aggregate of the amounts paid or likely to be paid during a year to the supplier of grains or the contractor, as the case may be, does not or ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... quarterly intervals in Form VAT - R6 within a month of the close of the quarter and shall pay lump sum, if any, due from him according to such return after adjusting the amount paid under sub-rule (4). 15. It is not in dispute that the appellant is liable to pay tax as he is a works contractor. Section 9 of the Act enables the State Government to accept from any class of dealers in lieu of tax payable under the Act, by way of composition, a lump sum tax, determined in the manner prescribed. Rule 49(3) of the Rules prescribed for the year in question tax @ 4% of the payments received or receivable by a contractor during the quarter for execution of contract. It further provides that payment of lump sum so calculated is to be made within 30 days following close of the quarter, regularly. A contractor is entitled to deduct from the amount of tax payable by him, the amount paid by the contractee on his behalf under Section 24 of the Act. Treasury receipt in proof of payment made by the contractee is required to be furnished along with the returns, which are to be filed quarterly, within one month after the close of the quarter. The appellant being a contractor and liable to pay tax....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Aforesaid Scheme of the Act and the Rules clearly defines rights and duties of the contractor and the contractee. Principal liability of payment of tax is on the contractor. He is liable to file periodic returns and pay tax accordingly. Parallel on the other side for advance collection of tax and for better compliance, liability has been put on the contractee to deduct tax from the payments to the contractor. The amount of tax deducted is to be paid to the department as prescribed. The contractor is entitled to get credit of the tax paid on his behalf by the contractee from the tax payable by him. A contractor can claim credit of the tax paid on his behalf by a contractee only to the extent certificate has been issued to him by the contractee and the same has been attached by him along with the returns. Rest of the tax is to be paid by him along with the returns. Merely on presumption about deduction or payment of tax by the contractee on his behalf, a contractor cannot absolve himself from liability to pay tax as per the returns filed. The liabilities to pay interest and penalty on the contractor and levy of penalty on the contractee are independent for their respective defaults. ....