<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1098 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336453</link>
    <description>The statutory scheme under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 keeps the contractor&#039;s primary liability to pay tax and interest distinct from the contractee&#039;s duty to deduct and deposit tax at source. Delayed deposit by the contractee does not shift that liability to the contractee or extinguish the contractor&#039;s obligation to pay interest under Section 14(6). The contractor may receive credit for tax deducted at assessment, while the contractee&#039;s failure to deduct or deposit tax attracts an independent penalty under Section 24(6). Liability for interest was therefore treated as recoverable from the contractor despite the contractee&#039;s default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 07:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1098 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336453</link>
      <description>The statutory scheme under the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 keeps the contractor&#039;s primary liability to pay tax and interest distinct from the contractee&#039;s duty to deduct and deposit tax at source. Delayed deposit by the contractee does not shift that liability to the contractee or extinguish the contractor&#039;s obligation to pay interest under Section 14(6). The contractor may receive credit for tax deducted at assessment, while the contractee&#039;s failure to deduct or deposit tax attracts an independent penalty under Section 24(6). Liability for interest was therefore treated as recoverable from the contractor despite the contractee&#039;s default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>