2016 (12) TMI 890

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sri K.C. Jena, A.D.C.  (A.R.) For the Respondent(s) ORDER Grievance of the  appellant is that although the appellant has been suspended from 29th July, 2011 and  the date of confirmation of suspension is from 23/8/2011 as well as  the offence report received on 18/07/2011, Commissioner of Customs proceeded to issue  the show cause notice on 27/5/2013. This is contra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r of Customs, proceeded to pass the order of revocation on 20.2.2015 i.e. after eleven months  under rule 22 (7) of the CHALR, 2004. This is also contrary to law. 2.2  The time limit prescribed by law is mandatory and the appellant is not permitted to suffer  in view of the decisions of the  of the  Tribunal A few of such decisions are as under: (i) 2016-TIOL-157-CES....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... date of issuance of the show cause notice. 22 (7) 20 (7) Passing of order by the Commissioner Within 90 days from the date of submission of the Inquiry Report. TOTAL DURATION     270 DAYS OR 9 MONTHS 4.  It may be appreciated that the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Saro International Freight Systems Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai report....