2016 (12) TMI 889

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Consultant  For Appellant(s) Sri S.K. Naskar, A.C.  (A.R.) For The Respondent(s) ORDER Grievance of the  appellant is that although the appellant has been suspended from 10th February, 2009 as well as  the offence report was issued received on 28/01/2009. Commissioner of Customs proceeded to issue with the show cause notice on 30/5/2013. This is contrary to the basic ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o pass the order of revocation on 03.03.2015 i.e. after Twenty months  under rule 22 (7) of the CHALR, 2004. This is also contrary to law. 2.2  The time limit prescribed by law is mandatory and the appellant is not permitted to suffer  in view of the decisions of the  of the  Tribunal A few of such decisions are as under: (i) 2016-TIOL-157-CESTAT-DEL M/s. Althaarv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s from the date of issuance of the show cause notice. 22 (7)   20 (7)   Passing of order by the Commissioner Within 90 days from the date of submission of the Inquiry Report. TOTAL DURATION     270 DAYS OR 9 MONTHS   4.  It may be appreciated that the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in the case of Saro International Freight Systems Vs.....