2016 (12) TMI 725

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Technical) Sh. Anil Raj, Representative, for the appellant Sh. Satya Pal, AR, for the respondent PER: ASHOK JINDAL The Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order. 2. The facts of the case are that the respondent were cleared goods in domestic tariff area in excess of the quantity permitted as per law without payment of proper duty and were also not paying duty of Additional dut....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... by the Revenue before the Ld. Commissioner (A), who also upheld the order of the adjudicating authority granting the refund claim. Aggrieved from the said order, the Revenue is before us on the ground that the refund claim is barred by limitation. 3. Heard the parties and considered the submissions. 4. In this case it is admitted position that the respondent paid the duty during the course ....